![]() 01/14/2014 at 21:25 • Filed to: cras | ![]() | ![]() |
Imagine if Pontiac was killed off in 1964... Would people have done this (my 5 minute Photoshoppe CRAS)?
No. They wouldn't have. So why do this?
![]() 01/14/2014 at 21:26 |
|
That chin is bigger than Jay Leno's.
![]() 01/14/2014 at 21:27 |
|
I hate that GTO version, but I really love most of the Trans-Am ones. I have dreams of one day buying a V6 Camaro, putting a turbo on it, and making a new Turbo T/A.
![]() 01/14/2014 at 21:28 |
|
Why? Why would subject my eyes to that?! Think of the children!
![]() 01/14/2014 at 21:31 |
|
It was sorta neat when I saw the first fantasy TA. A TA based on a Camaro makes sense. But now everybody with fiberglass skill made there own and it's played out. A Camaro based retro GTO is just silly. Even if the new Camaro is sort of based on the last GTO.
![]() 01/14/2014 at 21:34 |
|
Needs DCT!!!
![]() 01/14/2014 at 21:35 |
|
With the way the last GTO looked, it woulda been a solid evolution of the last F-Body Camaro. It totally has the same lines and attributes.
![]() 01/14/2014 at 21:41 |
|
I'm tired of the lack of T-tops and visibility
![]() 01/14/2014 at 22:16 |
|
T-tops are the solution to bad visibility! Just stand up!
![]() 01/14/2014 at 22:17 |
|
Nobody bought the last GTO because it wasn't mean enough, but you're completely right. It does kind of look like the 4th Camaro.
![]() 01/14/2014 at 22:27 |
|
They always just look like a camaro. They look more like the Camaro than any kit car looks like the original so its just lazyness on the part of the maker.
![]() 01/14/2014 at 23:20 |
|
Especially with the stock Camaro interior.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 19:09 |
|
Good god the rear end of that faux GTO is sickening!
![]() 01/16/2014 at 19:16 |
|
Yea, it's pretty bad. Seems way too planar.